Industry
Government, Health
Organisation Size
12000 operation staff, 22 sites
Initiative
ERP Implementation
Services
End-to-end change management, Resistance management, Train-the-trainer, Stakeholder engagement
Scope
All non clinical staff across 22 sites
Platforms
IBM Enterprise Asset Management
Key Result
Successful transition away from multiple disconnected legacy systems toward a centralised digital operational platform supporting facilities, maintenance, assets and service management.
Royal Melbourne Hospital (part of Melbourne Health) was managing facilities operations across a complex network of hospitals, rehabilitation centres and satellite sites using a patchwork of ageing systems, spreadsheets and paper-based processes.
Critical non-clinical operational teams, including cleaning, transport, security and facilities management, were relying on disconnected tools that limited visibility, slowed decision-making and created unnecessary manual work. Many processes existed only as institutional knowledge held by long-term staff.
The organisation selected Trixi as their Systems Implementation (SI) partner, opting for an IBM solution as the foundation for a major digital transformation project. This was to be a multi-phase rollout designed to centralise facilities, maintenance, asset, space and sustainability management into one unified platform.
But the challenge was never just technical (though, in truth it rarely is).
This was a workforce spread across 22 sites, with frontline operational teams working in highly reactive healthcare environments where priorities could change in minutes. The project would affect cleaners, maintenance teams, help desk staff, clinical support workers, facilities managers and executives alike.
The organisation needed a practical, people-focused change approach that could support adoption without disrupting critical hospital operations.
The Challenge
The scale of the transformation was significant.
The new platform would eventually replace multiple legacy systems and digitise hundreds of manual workflows across facilities and support services.
Many staff had never worked inside a structured digital workflow before; as such, many teams were heavily paper-based. Others relied on informal workarounds and deeply embedded local processes that had evolved over many years often for unknown reasons.
The project also faced a major practical obstacle: the underlying operational data required to support the rollout was incomplete, inconsistent and, in some cases, simply unavailable. Floor plans, asset records and site information needed extensive remediation before digital implementation could progress effectively.
As the rollout progressed into the COVID-19 period, operational pressures intensified and the engagement evolved alongside the implementation itself. Frontline teams were already managing constant procedural change, workforce pressure and rapidly shifting priorities, making it critical that the transformation reduced operational friction rather than added to it.
All the while, the teams still had to keep the hospitals running.
Unlike many corporate environments, frontline teams operated in spaces where emergencies, shifting priorities and rapid operational change were part of daily life. Training, engagement and adoption activities had to work around that reality rather than compete with it.

How we worked
Our change management approach focused on reducing friction, building trust and helping people understand how the new system would improve daily operations rather than simply introducing another layer of process.
The work began with extensive operational engagement across impacted teams. Workshops and working sessions mapped current-state processes, identified pain points and uncovered the reality of how work was actually being done day to day. It was a significant undertaking, but a critical one; getting it right early would reduce friction later in the project.
Communication and engagement was intentionally practical and operational, focused on impact rather than transformation messaging. Teams needed to understand how the new system would affect their day-to-day work, what would change, and where processes would become simpler, faster or more visible.
Resistance management became a critical part of the program and often reflected the nature of the work itself. Teams working in highly responsive clinical environments, such as Emergency Departments, were generally more adaptable to rapid operational change. Others, whose work operated at a slower pace and had relied on long-standing manual processes for years, were understandably more resistant to changing established ways of working.
Some staff were enthusiastic early adopters. Others were uncertain about how their roles would change, while some were openly sceptical of the new systems and workflows.
Structured engagement and coaching plans were used to identify concerns early and work directly with impacted teams. Training was delivered progressively and aligned closely to operational workflows so staff could connect system usage to the reality of their day-to-day responsibilities. The focus wasn’t just on systems training; it also worked with teams to build confidence and capability inside the new ways of working.
Importantly, the program recognised that successful adoption in healthcare environments depends heavily on operational trust. Teams needed to believe the system would genuinely help them respond faster, coordinate better and reduce administrative burden during already pressured shifts.
The result
The platform rollout established the foundation for a more integrated, digitally enabled facilities operation across the Melbourne Health network.
The organisation successfully transitioned away from multiple disconnected legacy systems toward a centralised operational platform supporting facilities, maintenance, assets and service management.
The project also introduced:
mobile task management capabilities for operational staff
centralised service request processes
digitised workflows replacing manual approvals and paper-based processes
improved operational visibility and reporting
a unified facilities management platform across multiple hospital sites.
Just as importantly, the organisation built stronger internal capability around managing digital change inside operational healthcare environments.
The transformation required teams to adapt to entirely new ways of working
while continuing to support essential hospital operations. By grounding the program in practical engagement, operational empathy and structured on site change support, the rollout maintained momentum through a highly complex implementation environment.
The result was not simply a new system, but a more connected operational foundation capable of supporting future growth, visibility and service improvement across the network.
Planning a complex ERP or digital transformation project? Talk to us about building change capability that supports adoption, continuity and long-term operational success.
Drop Katy a line
This case study reflects qualitative outcomes as reported by project stakeholders. Specific commercial data has been withheld due to client confidentiality.
Download the full
case study.
Just enter your email to receive the full case study, direct to your inbox.



